Spring 2025 Institute at Hostos Community College

Course Redisign Institute

in American Political & Social Thought

Spring 2025: Hostos Community College

About the Institute

Empowering community college faculty to use discussion-based approaches in teaching American political & social thought.

The Community College Course Redesign Institute in American Political and Social Thought Spring 2025 aimed to help instructors in history, political science, and related social sciences explore discussion-based approaches to studying transformative works in American political and social thought. Community college faculty participants supported each other as they explored readings and discussion prompts based on the work of authors like Plato, Locke, Wollstonecraft, Phillis Wheatley, Publius, Tocqueville, Maria Stewart, Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Sojourner Truth, W.E.B. Du Bois, Dr. King, and other works, which reflect contemporary engagement with this tradition that the participants selected for this institute and brought to the discussion.

In the Spring 2025 institute, sixteen community college faculty members were invited to discuss how to courageously, truthfully, and productively address our nation’s struggle to live up to the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the promise of liberty and equality for all while ensuring that each individual in diverse community college classrooms can participate fully in these discussions. Two leaders guided the Fall 2024 institute, Dr. Emily Stacey and Ted Hadzi-Antich Jr., each of whom were community college faculty colleagues with many years of experience in discussion-based pedagogy and who will help participants address how to create classrooms where students feel free to openly express themselves on political and social issues about which there is disagreement and how we can ensure that our courses help students acquire the tools they need to develop their political understanding and agency.
 
Fall 2024 (Austin Community College) institute was funded by a generous grant from the Teagle Foundation, in partnership with The Jack Miller Center. Please reach out to ted@tgqf.org if your institution or organization is interested in hosting and/or supporting a future institute!

Spring 2025 Institute

Spring 2025 Participants

Spring 2025 Participants

I really loved that all of the faculty were community college faculty as to a certain extent we have the same sort of demographic of students versus a 4-year college or university.  This made it much easier to think about what would work/ wouldn't work.

2024 APST Participant

One of the best parts of the Institute for me was reconnecting with text in fresh ways, sparking new ideas on how to weave it into my own content. I also loved how the group discussions were so diverse—it really helped me see different perspectives on how to align content vertically with core subjects. Those conversations were both insightful and practical, giving me plenty to bring back to the classroom. 

2024 APST Participant

The small group discussions were fantastic! Keep doing these -- they allow more voices to be heard.

2024 APST Participant

This institute ran like a well-oiled machine.  I loved that all of the transportation and meals were taken care of (and good!)  It allowed us to focus more on the topics of the workshop itself.  I also liked the dinners to be able to get to know the other participants/ facilitators in a more relaxed setting.

2024 APST Participant

I personally felt that the small groups were the most meaningful part of the workshop and getting to spend time with other faculty and hear their perspectives about the texts, as well as what they did within their own classrooms and other readings that they would pair the readings with.  I very much appreciated the exchange of ideas and was able to think aloud about how I would want to incorporate these texts into my own class.

2024 APST Participant

I appreciated the use of small group discussions to demonstrate the utility of the discussion-based teaching method. It was also really helpful to share ideas with other community college professors in these small group settings.

2024 APST Participant

Amy Traver

Queensbourough Community College CUNY

Ana Gomez Sierra

Georgia State Perimeter College

Benjamin Augustyn

Miami-Dade Community College

Dion Daly

Jamestown Community College SUNY

Greg Marks

Hostos Community College CUNY

Jennifer Corby

Kingsbourough Community College CUNY

Katherine Morgan

Murray State College/Oklahoma

Kristopher Burrell

Hostos Community College CUNY

Laura Landau

Kingsbourough Community College CUNY

Leticia Sara

Aims Community College Colorado

Nichole Shippen

LaGuardia Community College

Shalon Hallager

Dutchess Community College SUNY

Sunny Heenen

Austin Community College

Victor Corona

West LA College

Victor Torres-Velez

Hostos Community College CUNY

Institute Goal

The main goal of our time together in the institute is to creatively explore with one another how we might effectively include discussion of these and related texts in the courses we teach and to support one another in sharing pedagogical approaches to discussion-based learning as we become more thoughtful about the seven Institute Guiding Questions identified below. The institute is organized to help each individual faculty participant realize their own vision for a curriculum that broadly addresses these Guiding Questions. We are committed to respecting and supporting the academic freedom of each participant in their course redesign.

Instructor

Instructor

Instructor

Guiding Questions

Transformative Works

Transformative Works in American Political & Social Thought Classical Context through 1950

The readings and questions here are intended to help inspire curriculum exploration and discovery. We invite you to explore these selections and hope that you may make some new discoveries on how to approach these texts and those like it, as we look forward to exploring the contemporary voices that engage with the American political tradition that participants will bring to each institute.

Classical Context

Is it possible for a political or social order to treat all of its members fairly, even those who greatly challenge it? What contemporary ideas about the Good Life (i.e., political or social ideas people may have about the best way for humans to live) do you think should not be tolerated in our society, and what would the strongest Apology (defense speech) be for living according to one of those visions?

Antigone believes that there is a difference between what is legal and what is just. What is the difference between the “legal” and the “just”? How does she know that Creon’s command regarding her brother’s burial is unjust?  Creon argues that whatever he, the king, commands isjust because it is the command of the ruler. How does Antigone respond to this? Are there laws in our society today that are legal but nerveless unjust? How do we accurately tell the difference between just and unjust laws?



Spartan society under the laws of Lycurgus lacks many ills that plague our own, such as lawsuits, fights over money, obesity, jealousy, infidelity, substance abuse, unemployment, unsatisfying jobs, childhood illness and more. How did Lycurgus eliminate these ills from Sparta and was it worth it?

Enlightenment Political Thought

Alexander Hamilton argued that the teaching of Chapter 14 presented an “absurd and impious doctrine”, which he believed Hobbes advanced because he “disbelieved the existence of an intelligent superintending principle, who is the governor, and will be the final judge of the universe.” Do you agree with Hamilton that this disbelief would lead one to conclude that human beings have the, “moral power to deprive another of his life, limbs, property or liberty?”

How does Locke understand the basis of human equality? How would you state his argument for why human beings are naturally equal in a way that would be clearly understood by people today but that is also faithful to what he says in Chapter 2?

Montesquieu praised the separation of powers in the English constitution. How do you see the principle of separation of powers functioning in the U.S. today, especially in light of recent debates over the use of executive orders, the independence of the judiciary, or Congress’s role in checks and balances? Are these branches of government maintaining a proper balance of power?

Can equal rights and dignity be established and secured on anything other than ideals that are regarded as universal and natural?

The Founding & Ratification of The Constitution

What are the self-evident truths discussed here? What does it mean for a truth to be “self-evident”? Do you think most people in the US today still believe that these are truths and if so, that they are self-evident, regardless of their political affiliations?

Hamilton argues that the primary aim of society is, “moral security, for our lives and properties,” and that “such security can never exist, while we have no part in making the laws that are to bind us and while it may be the interest of our uncontrolled legislators to oppress us as much as possible.” Which groups or individuals might truthfully advance this same objection today and why?

What do you imagine Abigail Adams’ perspective would be on contemporary issues related to race and gender, given what you’ve learned about her thoughts on such issues from reading her letters to her husband, John?

In her poem, To the Right Honourable William, Earl of Dartmouth, Wheatley argues that her “love of freedom” was born from her experience of being kidnaped from Africa and brought to the United States enslaved, “I then pray others may never feel tyrannic sway.” How does her poetry contribute to the fight for freedom, both in her time and in ours?

Why do you think they chose to write “more perfect” rather than simply “perfect.” What might that tell us about their expectations for the government they sought to create? What change to the constitution would you recommend to make it “more perfect”?

What is Madison’s definition of a faction and what are the examples he provides of factions? Why do factions pose such great problems in popular governments? According to him, every individual may be considered a member of one or more factions. To which faction do you belong and in what respect is your faction “adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interest of the community”?

Why do the anti-federalists believe that ambitious, self-interested people will be attracted to serve in positions of authority under the proposed constitution? If they met our political leaders today, would they feel vindicated for expressing these fears?

How optimistic was Jefferson that the Declaration’s principles were taking root around the globe? Do you think this optimism was misplaced? What was Jefferson referring to when he mentioned “monkish ignorance and superstition” as a force keeping men in chains?

Observations on A New Nation, A New World and New Challenges

What threats do Individualism and the myopic pursuit of material well being pose for democracies? What structural, institutional and/or cultural guardrails does Tocqueville observe that contain these problems, and do you see them functioning in that way in the contemporary US?

If Stewart were speaking to an oppressed or marginalized group today, how would she exhort them to most effectively confront their situation? What concrete steps might she argue that this group take towards that end, given what she has written in these essays?

What does Mill mean by tyranny of the majority?  In what political and social environments does tyranny of the majority arise?

In what areas do people have the most fear about freely expressing themselves? When have you kept quiet there out of fear of appearing out of step with prevailing views?

The Promise of Liberty

Lincoln claims that “a house divided against itself cannot stand”, and that our nation must be united on an issue as fundamental as the morality of slavery if it is to remain standing. Why does Lincoln believe that a nation must be united about basic moral principles? What fundamental issues are dividing our nation today, and what might unity look like about one of them?

In Chapter 7, Douglass explains how he traded bread for the “more valuable bread of knowledge” with hungry children who could teach him to read, suggesting that physical nourishment is less important than spiritual sustenance. How is your education aimed at providing both the bread of material well-being and the bread of knowledge?

Cooper argues that, “Any act performed by an ignorant slattern is menial, while no amount of indignity can really degrade a soul truly in possession of itself through scientific development of its faculties.” What kind of education does Cooper believe is necessary to develop these faculties? Are you receiving that kind of an education today?

What kind of education does Du Bois think is required for a free people? What sorts of things do they need to study and how should that education be conducted? Is your education an education for freedom?

Which of your enemies would be the hardest to love, and what would you have to do or see to be able to love them? Think of someone whom you dislike very much. Attempting to practice what Dr. King preached here, consider one element of good in that person. What is that good thing?

Contemporary Voices

Texts Will Be Recommended By Participants

Participants in each institute will be encouraged to recommend contemporary works (post-1950) and discussion questions that will help students engage with the American political tradition and the Institute's seven Guiding Questions. Before the institute begins, participants will be asked to share suggestions, including texts like book chapters, essays, opinion pieces, as well as works of art such as short stories, poems, music, visual art, or other items, that reflect an engagement with the tradition of American political thought, as our participants understand that. These texts and questions will be shared with all participants and form the basis of about 25% of each institute's program.

Curriculum Advisory Committee

The institute curriculum and approach to discussion-based study was developed by TGQF leadership, and draws from over a decade of experience leading class discussions on transformative texts and ideas, as well as developing community college faculty training and fellowships to help colleagues successfully do the same. Many of the discussion questions we will explore in this institute originated from ideas shared by the over 60 community college faculty members who completed TGQF summer curriculum redesign workshops since 2022, Great Questions Journey faculty members who teach discussion-based government courses at Austin Community College, and from Community Seminar discussion questions. The following individuals advised TGQF on the institute curriculum and design.

Social hour & Team Building

For me, the best part of the institute was processing the challenges I have in the classroom with other professors who have been doing this for much longer than I have. I really appreciated that we had breaks in the afternoon so that I had energy to really get to know the other participants over dinner. The schedule balance between small discussions, group discussions, and down time worked perfectly.

Laura Landau, 2025 APST Participant

Kingsbourough Community College CUNY

The workshop was a wonderful opportunity to meet other faculty working in 2-yr institutions, and to learn about their work and student-centered approaches in the classroom. This was very inspiring.

Ana Gomez, 2025 APST Participant

Georgia State Perimeter College

I find the whole concept of the institute and the foundation to be very timely and necessary given our current political environment. In particular our underserved students at the community college level really need this exposure to foundational texts to be both successful as students and citizens. We do them a great disservice by not exposing them to these texts because we think they might not see their relevance or find them interesting. If we can direct political discussions around the words of the people who designed and modified the system we have now, then we can in many cases avoid the all of the negativity and name-calling plaguing political discourse today and mature as citizens...

Benjamin Augustyn, 2025 APST Participant

Miami-Dade Community College

Having participated in many other professional development opportunities, I particularly appreciated how well-balanced this workshop was in balancing collective and individual work, while also building in moments of rapport among participants. The ample opportunities for faculty to interact with one another significantly enhanced our intellectual exchanges, with the social component of personal connection enriching the experience tenfold. Kuddos!

Victor M. Torres-Velez, 2025 APST Participant

West LA College

Rita Koganzon

Rita Koganzon

North Carolina

Associate Professor, School of Civic Life and Leadership, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

ROOSEVELT MONTÁS

Roosevelt Montás

New York

Senior Lecturer in American Studies and English at Columbia University

Shellee O'Brien Picture

Shellee O'Brien

Texas

Adjunct Professor of Government at Austin Community College in Texas

Raúl Rodriguez

Texas

Assistant Professor in the School of Civic Leadership at the University of Texas at Austin

Emily Stacey

Oklahoma

Professor of and Program Coordinator for Political Science at Rose State College in Oklahoma

Mark Urista

Mark Urista

Oregon

Speech Communication Faculty and Faculty Advisor for the Civil Discourse Program at Linn-Benton Community College in Oregon

apply for the Next Institute

Join us for the next Community College Course Redesign Institute in American Political and Social Thought aimed to help instructors in history, political science, and related social sciences explore discussion-based approaches to studying transformative works in American political and social thought.